Appendix C: Modified Covenant Theology — The 13 Distinctives
The following chart compares four major covenant systems across the thirteen theological distinctives that define Modified Covenant Theology. MCT was articulated around 2004 and named by Brandan Kraft. The theological raw material came largely from Bob Higby and from Scripture. The framework was stress-tested against a Reformed theologian and defended against Phil Johnson. The ontological framework that undergirds this book, the derivation from a single sentence, the rendering engine vocabulary, the four-layer model of the mind, and the eschatological vision of Chapters 28 and 29, are original to this book and extend beyond MCT into territory no prior system has entered.
| Distinctive | CT | DT | NCT | MCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Order of Decrees | Infralapsarian (most) | Infra at most (often non-Calvinist) | Infralapsarian (where held) | Supralapsarian1 |
| 2. Justification | At faith | At faith | At faith | From eternity |
| 3. Sanctification | Progressive | Progressive | Progressive | Positional and continuous |
| 4. The Law | Moral law binding (third use) | Ended for church age | Ended (varies) | All law ended in Christ |
| 5. Liberty | Regulated by moral law | Free from Mosaic law | Free from Mosaic law | Believe in Jesus and do as you please |
| 6. Federal Headship | Adam as legal representative | Adam as head of humanity | Covenant of works rejected; representation varies | Rejected entirely |
| 7. Adam’s Nature | Created righteous, fell | Created righteous, fell | Created righteous, fell | Created sinful |
| 8. Satan’s Origin | Created righteous, fell | Created righteous, fell | Created righteous, fell | Created evil, never fell |
| 9. The Two Seeds | Not emphasized | Israel vs. church | Not emphasized | Ontologically different |
| 10. The Gospel | Offered to all | Offered to all | Offered to all | Proclaimed, not offered |
| 11. Common Grace | Affirmed | Affirmed | Varies | Denied |
| 12. Covenant of Redemption | Affirmed | Not emphasized | Not emphasized | Affirmed |
| 13. Progressive Revelation | Progressive administration of one covenant | Progressive dispensations | New fulfills and replaces old | Progressive rendering, not covenant |
The framework’s distinctive positions, expanded.
Decrees and supralapsarianism. MCT is the only true supralapsarian system. God decreed all events from the end to the beginning: the Lamb slain from the foundation, the elect chosen for glory, creation as the stage on which the plan unfolds.
Justification from eternity. God never viewed His people as condemned. Justification is not a verdict pronounced at faith; it is the eternal status the cross renders into time.
Sanctification. Christ IS the believer’s sanctification. There is no progressive holiness on the believer’s status. There is continuous growth in knowledge and experience.
The law and liberty. All the law ended in Christ; the believer is dead to all of it. The Spirit writes the commandments on the heart. Rebuke the imposers.
Federal headship rejected. God creates each person sinful directly. No intermediary, no representation, no legal machinery between Adam and his descendants.
Adam, Satan, and the seeds. Adam was created sinful, not righteous; the fall revealed a nature already inclined toward sin. Satan was created evil, never fell: Isaiah 14 is about Babylon, Ezekiel 28 about Tyre. The elect and the reprobate are ontologically different seeds, as different as a rock from an apple.
Gospel and common grace. The gospel is proclamation, not offer. Faith is a gift, not a duty. There is no “human responsibility” concerning salvation. God’s provision to the reprobate is common bounty, not grace; calling it grace profanes Christ’s love for His bride.
Covenant of redemption. The three persons of the Trinity covenanted for the salvation of the elect before the foundation of the world.
Progressive rendering, not covenant. The covenant of grace was always present. The resolution increased over time. OT saints had the substance dimly; the New Testament saints have it at higher fidelity.
The Core Distinction
CT says you’re a member of a covenant class. MCT says you’re a specific, personal thought of God, an eternal promise made to YOU, not to a category to which you belong.
Every other system requires a legal mechanism between God and His people. MCT says the mechanism IS the promise. And a promise from a timeless God to a thought in His own mind doesn’t need a courtroom. It just needs love.
Supralapsarianism is a minority position — historically fewer than five percent of all Calvinists — and it lives entirely inside the Reformed/Covenant tradition. It does not appear in Dispensationalism, which is not creedally Calvinistic (its adherents range from Arminian to, less often, infralapsarian Calvinist), nor in New Covenant Theology, which is Calvinistic in soteriology but infralapsarian where the lapsarian question is engaged at all. Covenant Theology is the only system here with a genuine supralapsarian wing, and Chapter 5 argues that even those supralapsarians are not consistent.↩︎